Bishi v secretary for education

Author: rnzm

August undefined, 2024

WebJul 29, 2005 · The standard factors to be considered in deciding whether or not to condone the late filing of an application for review are: the degree of non-compliance, the explanation for it; and the applicants prospects of success- Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (2) ZLR 240 (H); Mushaishi v Lifeline Syndicate and Another 1990 (1) ZLR 284 (H ); … WebBishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (20 ZLR (H) at 242D-243C”. In casu assuming that the judgment was handed down on the 13th March 2015 which of course does not …

LATE APPEALS: CONDONATION... - Labour Aspects …

WebJun 3, 2014 · See also Beitbridge Rural District Council v Russell Construction Co (Pvt) Ltd 1998 (2) ZLR 190(S) at 193B-G; Bishi v Secretary for Education supra at 244A-D. This, to me, is an appropriate case for imputing upon the applicants the consequences of the non-compliance with the Rules by their legal practitioners. WebIn Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (2) ZLR 240 (HC) it was held per CHIDYAUSIKU J (as he then was) that the following are the factors to be taken into account in considering whether good cause has been shown: “(a) the degree of non-compliance with the rules; (b) the explanation therefore; how has king midas changed

Maheya v Independent African Church (Civil Appeal No. 303/99

WebBishi v Secretary for Education 1989(2) ZLR 240 (H) at 242D-243C. The applicant has been in a position of no right in respect to her occupation of the “church house” for the past seven years and the same period of time marks the degree of non-compliance with r 34(1) of the Rules of the Supreme Court. She has blamed her erstwhile legal ... WebBishi v Secretary for Education, 1989 (2) ZLR 240 (HC) at 243 B-C adds a further three requirements which an applicant for condonation must satisfy in addition to the requirements which the Supreme Court enunciated in Kombayi v Berkout (supra). These are: iv) the importance of the case; v) the convenience of the court – and WebFeb 16, 2024 · Earlier this month, Betsy DeVos was confirmed as the 11th U.S. secretary of education, inheriting the management of a $69 billion, 4,200-employee agency at a … how has lgbt rights changed over the years

LIST OF CASES Zimbabwe Legal Information Institute

Bishi v secretary for education

WebSep 16, 2005 · When Culture Clashes with the Criminal Law Case note on S v Hamunakwadi 2015 (1) ZLR 392 (H); S v Musino HH-158-17 and S v Taurayi HH-298-90 By Geoff Feltoe; Aligning the Administrative Justice Act with the Constitution; Books. Final Papers of the 2016 National Symposium on the Promise of the Declaration of Rights … WebBishi. v . Secretary for Education (supra). In my judgment, I find that the following factors compensate for the delay in filing this application and the poor explanation therefor: the slight delay in filing the opposing papers. the explanation for that slight delay.

Did you know?

WebSee Secretary for Transport & Another v Makwavarara 1991 (1) ZLR 18 (S). ... See Gula Ndebele v Bhunu NO 2010 (1) ZLR 78 (H), Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (2) ZLR 240 (H), Maheya v Independent Church of Africa SC 58/07, Muroiwa v Delta Operations Ltd & Another 2002 (2) ZLR 30 (S).

WebApr 16, 2024 · In the case of Bishi v Secretary for Education, the court commented on the importance of mitigation as follows, “Even justice administered under a palm tree … WebIn Ful Chand v. Nazab Ali Chowdhry 36 C. 184 : 9 C.L.J. 105 : 13 C.W.N. 134 : 1 Ind. Cas. 740 Stephen and Doss, JJ. also held that the absence of the wife makes no difference to …

WebIf authority is required for this self evident concept, it is to be found in Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989(2) ZLR 240 (H) at 242D; and Mushaishi v Lifeline Syndicate & Anor 1990(1) ZLR 284 (H) at 288E-F. The court is entitled to refuse to … WebIn Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (2) ZLR 240 (HC) it was held per CHIDYAUSIKU J (as he then was) that the following are the factors to be taken into account in considering whether good cause has been shown: “(a) the degree of non-compliance with the rules;

WebOct 10, 2007 · The reviewing judges should be careful not to erode such discretion – Ramushu & Ors v S SC-25-93; S v Matanhire HH-18-02; Mavhundwa v S HH-91-02; ... SA 135 (A) at 141C-E; S v McNab 1986 (2) ZLR 280 SC; Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (2) ZLR 240 (HC) at 243G-244F and Khumalo v Mafurirano HB-11-04. This is a …

WebThese are the reasons for the order. On 17 January 2013 the respondent instituted proceedings by way of summons against the two applicants claiming payment of a sum … highest rated michelin chefsWebJan 30, 2014 · See Kombayi v Berkhou SC 30/1988 and Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (2) ZLR 240 (H) at page 243 B. I am satisfied upon perusal of the record that the period of delay is not inordinate, the explanation tendered for the delay is reasonable. In my view Appellant also has good prospects of success on appeal. highest rated mha episodeWebRishi Sunak ( / ˈrɪʃi ˈsuːnæk / ( listen) RI-shee SOO-nak; [1] born 12 May 1980) is a British politician who has served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and Leader of the Conservative Party since October 2024. He previously held two cabinet positions under Boris Johnson, lastly as Chancellor of the Exchequer from 2024 to 2024. highest rated mfa shoesWebCommission v Moyo 1997(1) ZLR 254 (S) at 259A-B; Wilmot v Zimbabwe Owner Driver Organisation (Pvt) Ltd 1966(2) ZLR 415(S) and Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989(2) ZLR 240H. This court exercises judicial discretion in such matters. But, the applicant has to make a substantive application for the court to highest rated michelin restaurantsWebRequirements: - Ref Case: - UNITED PLANT HIRE (PTY) LTD V HILLS AND ORS 1976(1) SA 717 (A) at p720F-G (HOLMES JA) quoted with approval by Chidyausiku CJ in the … how has life changed for the samiWebMar 2, 2003 · If authority is required for this self evident concept, it is to be found in Bishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (2) ZLR 240 (H) at 242D; and Mushaishi v Lifeline Syndicate & Anor 1990 (1) ZLR 284 (H) at 288E-F. The court is entitled to refuse to review or may condone the omission. how has land features influenced the bahamasWebBishi v Secretary for Education 1989 (20 ZLR (H) at 242D-243C”. In casu assuming that the judgment was handed down on the 13th March 2015 which of course does not appear in the record, the twenty-one days period fell on the … how has land law developed