WebDec 3, 2024 · Instead of deleting 100,000 rows in one large transaction, you can delete 100 or 1,000 or some arbitrary number of rows at a time, in several smaller transactions, in a loop. In addition to reducing the impact on the log, you … WebApr 14, 2011 · Most effective way to Delete large number of rows from an online table on a daily basis I have a need to write a cleanup script that would delete old data (1-2 Million rows)based on a date on a daily basis. Almost equal amount of rows are inserted into the same table daily as well. Any suggestions on the most efficient way of doing that. Table …
oracle - How to free space after deleting the millions of rows from …
WebTo summarize the specifics: We need to stage approximately 5 million rows into a vendor (Oracle) database. Everything goes great for batches of 500k rows using OracleBulkCopy (ODP.NET), but when we try to scale up to 5M, the performance starts slowing to a crawl once it hits the 1M mark, gets progressively slower as more rows are loaded, and … WebJul 8, 2009 · The table has been partitioned and indexed. As a part of monthly ETL process, I need to delete around 1500 records from this huge table first. Then rebuild up new monthly records inserted into this table. To speed up this deletion, I use FORALL to do BULK DELETE the records. However, it didn't work or say it takes long time to process. iperf 2.0.13 download
How to do a while loop to delete rows based on rowcount?
http://www.oracleconnections.com/forum/topics/delete-millions-of-rows-from-the-table-without-the-table WebMar 16, 2015 · So let us assume this is an Oracle Standard Edition Database, and you want the delete of 10 million rows to be just one fast transaction, with no more than 2-4GB undo and 2-4GB temp usage, and redo should be as minimal as possible. WebAug 14, 2024 · If I want to update millions of rows, 1. then would delete/reinsert be faster or 2. mere update will be faster 3. the one you suggested will be faster. Can you advise as to why the method you had suggested will be faster than 1 and 2. Can you explain why updating millions of rows is not a good idea. iperf 0.00 bits/sec